Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
GT3-R 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful659 hp491 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight271 hp/t202 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score89/100
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Lightest2,195 kg4,839 lb
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 659hp491kW | 580hp433kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,436kg5,370lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Gross weight | 2,865kg6,316lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 63.1s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 709km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | - | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 358L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 295g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 11.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 46.2 s | - |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12 has 79 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12: 79 hp (59 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | 659 hp 491 kW | 3.7 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.7 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIISpeed 6.0 TSI W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 659 hp 491 kW | 580 hp 433 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 709 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 295 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III Speed 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 79 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Is 241 kg lighter
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























