Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GTC
6.0 i W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed319 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful590 hp440 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight254 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.9 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 590hp440kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 720Nm531lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 319 km/h 198 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 316 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 99.0s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 27.4L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t190kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,807mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 235L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 330g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 319 km/h 198 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 118 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has 30 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 319 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 254 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW | 4.5 s | 319 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.1 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 590 hp 440 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 319 km/h 198 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 330 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental GTC 6.0 i W12 48V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























