Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12vsPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Lightest2,235 kg4,927 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions267 g/km
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,491kg5,492lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.3s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 57.7s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 361Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 870km540mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,806cc293cu in |
| Length | - | 4,855mm191in |
| Width | - | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | - | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,661mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,675mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 670L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 308g/km | 267g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-5,750 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW |
Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12 has 65 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 2,491 kg 5,492 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 284 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 3.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.9 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.1 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentaygaSPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,491 kg 5,492 lb | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 870 km 540 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 308 g/km | 267 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12 | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga SPEED 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 41 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























