Bentley Bentayga EWB
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 580 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Lightest2,514 kg5,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score75/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,514kg5,542lb | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | - |
| Length | 5,305mm209in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,739mm68in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 3,175mm125in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh and Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Has 88 Nm more
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























