Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8vsPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Turbo S 4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful570 hp425 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest2,235 kg4,927 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range870 km540 mi
- Largest trunk670 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,388kg5,265lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 281 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | 870km540mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,806cc293cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,855mm191in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,954mm77in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,661mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,675mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 431L | 670L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 267g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 has 20 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 2,388 kg 5,265 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 284 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 746 km 463 mi |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 870 km 540 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 570 hp 425 kW | 4.1 s | 284 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo S 4.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,388 kg 5,265 lb | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | 870 km 540 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 267 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 431 L 15.2 cu ft | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo S 4.8 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 153 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 124 km (77 mi) more estimated range
- Has 239 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























