Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga · Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSivsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
3.0 P340
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,125mm202in | 4,797mm189in |
| Height | 1,770mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 479L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSi: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 6,400 rpm | 1,340-5,300 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 5.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSi and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.3 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentaygaFacelift 20203.0 V6 TFSi | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 479 L 16.9 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSi |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga Facelift 2020 3.0 V6 TFSi
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 500 kg lighter
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 269 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























