Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6vsJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017 5.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) · Facelift 2017
5.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8
- Most powerful352 hp262 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest2,424 kg5,344 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk800 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,083 km1,295 mi
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score97/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 352hp262kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 2,424kg5,344lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,949kg6,501lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.0s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 106.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 34.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,083km1,295mi Calculated | 719km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 5,654cc345cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,828mm190in |
| Width | - | 1,943mm76in |
| Height | 1,777mm70in | 1,802mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 270mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 800L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,770L | 1,689L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 94L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 34.9 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 352 hp 262 kW |
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 has 12 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 2,424 kg 5,344 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 5.5 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 7.3 s |
Although Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 has more power, Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 and Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8: 9.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 2,083 km 1,295 mi |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 719 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 352 hp 262 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 |
| 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK |
| JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | JeepGrand Cherokee IV (WK2)Facelift 20175.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 352 hp 262 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb | 2,424 kg 5,344 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,083 km 1,295 mi | 719 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 800 L 28.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 | Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.30 LC100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.14 LC100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 540 L143 US gal119 UK gal | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 945.00 LC/year | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 9.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,364 km (848 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 2017 5.7 V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 373 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























