Cadillac CTS I
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8vsBentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Arnage R
6.7 i V8 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.0 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score75/100
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
- Largest trunk374 L
- Best economy score52/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 536Nm395lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,970kg6,548lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 20.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 20.6L/100 km11.4mpg US13.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 30.7L/100 km7.7mpg US9.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 485km302mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,865mm192in | 5,390mm212in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,932mm76in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 3,116mm123in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 374L |
| Max trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 4,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 20.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 405 hp 302 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 4.6 s |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8 and Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V: 1.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | 405 hp 302 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8 | BentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 536 Nm 395 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 20.6 L/100 km 11.4 mpg US 13.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 485 km 302 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 20.6 L/100 km11.4 mpg US13.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 36.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 58.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,090 L816 US gal680 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,408 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS I V 5.7 i V8
- Is 840 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 75 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Arnage R 6.7 i V8 16V
- Has 299 Nm more
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























