BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 35ivsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions173 g/km
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Best economy score87/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 585km364mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,574mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,553mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI has 4 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.2 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5.2 s |
Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 585 km 364 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 733 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 585 km 364 mi | 733 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 46 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























