BMW Z4 (G29)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (G29) M40ivsAUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 703km437mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,324mm170in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,594mm63in | 1,574mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,800-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i has 30 hp more than AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 4.5 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 703 km 437 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | AUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 703 km 437 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (G29) M40i | AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























