Morgan Plus Four
Car comparison
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower TurbovsAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,009 kg2,224 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,009kg2,224lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,830mm151in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,650mm65in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 1,009 kg 2,224 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 4.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 5.6 s |
Although AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has more power, Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,009 kg 2,224 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 446 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























