Porsche Boxster (987)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions184 g/km
- Best estimated range759 km472 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight211 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.3s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 211hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 582km362mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,387cc207cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,329mm170in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4 has 23 hp more than AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 6.1 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4 has more power, AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 211 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 582 km 362 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | 211 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.4 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 582 km 362 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 211 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4 | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.4
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 178 km (110 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 78 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























