Porsche Boxster (987)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2vsAUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions184 g/km
- Best estimated range759 km472 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed268 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight208 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.7s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 615km382mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,329mm170in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 248g/km | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 has 8 hp more than AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 5.5 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 615 km 382 mi |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 615 km 382 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 248 g/km | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 64 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























