AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plusvsDonkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDonkervoort D8 GTO
GTO-S 2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Lightest740 kg1,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight486 hp/t363 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score85/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Best estimated range698 km434 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 740kg1,631lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | - |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 31.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 486hp/t363kW/t221hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 608Nm/t407lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 698km434mi Calculated | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 3,740mm147in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,350mm93in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: Power / Torque
- Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 5,500-6,700 rpm | 1,650-5,400 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 5,400 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 10.3 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 360 hp 268 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 740 kg 1,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 4.2 s |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 486 hp/t 363 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 698 km 434 mi |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 600 km 373 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.2 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 360 hp 268 kW | 3.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | 486 hp/t 363 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-S 2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 740 kg 1,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 698 km 434 mi | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 486 hp/t 363 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus | Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI plus
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-S 2.5 TFSI
- Is 795 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 252 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























