AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (G29) M40i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
M40i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best estimated range703 km437 mi
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 698km434mi Calculated | 703km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,589mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 281L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 4.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI and BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 698 km 434 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 703 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 698 km 434 mi | 703 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI | BMW Z4 (G29) M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























