Lotus Evora GT410
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6vsAUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) · Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) · Facelift 2019
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight300 hp/t223 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,368kg3,016lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.1s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 46.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 300hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 331Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,201mm165in |
| Width | 1,972mm78in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,344mm53in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,543mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 305L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 712L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,000-7,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,700-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 12.4 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 120 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6 has 10 hp more than AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 3.7 s |
Although Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6 has more power, AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT4103.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20192.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6 | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT410 3.5 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 82 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2019 2.5 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























