AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSIvsNissan 370Z 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 370Z
3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Best estimated range686 km426 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 328hp245kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,508kg3,325lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 652km405mi Calculated | 686km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,342mm53in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Nissan 370Z 3.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW |
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI has 12 hp more than Nissan 370Z 3.7.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 370Z 3.7 and AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.6 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 652 km 405 mi |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 686 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI | Nissan370Z3.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 328 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 652 km 405 mi | 686 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI | Nissan 370Z 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























