Car comparison

BMW Z4 (E89) 28ivsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z4 (E89)

28i

245 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2011-2013
VS

AUDI TT Roadster (8S)

2.0 TFSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW Z4 (E89) 28i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    164 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    809 km
    503 mi
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI

  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,425 kg
    3,142 lb
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ4 (E89)28iAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
245hp183kW
230hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,425kg3,142lb
Gross weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
75.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
19.6s
Calculated
20.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
797km495mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,239mm167in
4,177mm164in
Width
1,790mm70in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,291mm51in
1,355mm53in
Wheelbase
2,496mm98in
2,505mm99in
Front track
1,511mm59in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,552mm61in
Trunk volume-
280L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z4 (E89) 28iAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSIPowerTorque
  • BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ4 (E89)28i5,000-6,500 rpm1,250-4,800 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ4 (E89)28iAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.6 s
20.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
245 hp
183 kW
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW

BMW Z4 (E89) 28i has 15 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
1,425 kg
3,142 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i5.5 s
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI5.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
809 km
503 mi
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
797 km
495 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
245 hp
183 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,239 mm
166.9 in
Height
1,291 mm
50.8 in
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,177 mm
164.4 in
Height
1,355 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.5 s
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWZ4 (E89)28i
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ4 (E89)28iAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,239 mm
166.9 in
Height
1,291 mm
50.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
4,177 mm
164.4 in
Height
1,355 mm
53.3 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
797 km
495 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
-
280 L
9.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z4 (E89) 28iAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z4 (E89) 28i

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28i
30i
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsBMWZ4 (G29)30i
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
28i
3.0i
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsBMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
28i
30i
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsBMWZ4 (G29 LCI)Facelift 202230i
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
28i
3.0 si
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V
28i
2.9
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsPorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSIvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
28i
SLK 300
VS
BMWZ4 (E89)28ivsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i vs AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster