Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250dvsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8S)
2.0 TDI ultra
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,277 km793 mi
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,277km793mi Calculated | 1,163km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,177mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d has 20 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 6.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d and AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 1,277 km 793 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 1,163 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI ultra | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,277 km 793 mi | 1,163 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TDI ultra
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























