Porsche Boxster (986)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2vsAUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8N)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque305 Nm225 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 305Nm225lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km372mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,315mm170in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,455mm57in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 180L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 226g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 27 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 598 km 372 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 252 hp 188 kW | 5.9 s | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 260 km/h 162 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 372 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 226 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 | AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























