BMW Z4 (E85)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0ivsAUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8N)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.6s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,091mm161in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,299mm51in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,473mm58in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 180L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 226g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.6 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i has 6 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T and BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 733 km 456 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.9 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 226 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i | AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























