AUDI TT Roadster (8N)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 TvsAUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8S)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk212 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score29/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | - |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 62.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 4,184mm165in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,353mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,429mm96in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 212L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 226g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T has 5 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 5.6 s |
Although AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T has more power, AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 660 km 410 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | AUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 226 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 212 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























