Car comparison

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0ivsAUDI TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z4 (E85)

3.0i

231 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedRoadster2002-2006
VS

AUDI TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000

1.8 T

225 hp1781 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2000-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    733 km
    456 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    50/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ4 (E85)3.0iAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
231hp172kW
225hp168kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,515kg3,340lb
Gross weight
1,590kg3,505lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
84.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
22.6s
Calculated
28.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
733km456mi
Calculated
660km410mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,781cc109cu in
Length
4,091mm161in
4,041mm159in
Width
1,781mm70in
1,764mm69in
Height
1,299mm51in
1,348mm53in
Wheelbase
2,495mm98in
2,429mm96in
Front track
1,473mm58in
1,528mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,505mm59in
Trunk volume
300L
180L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
55L
62L
CO2 emissions-
226g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0iAUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 TPowerTorque
  • BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i5,900 rpm3,500 rpm6,150 rpm
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T5,900 rpm2,200-5,500 rpm6,150 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ4 (E85)3.0iAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.6 s
28.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
231 hp
172 kW
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
225 hp
168 kW

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i has 6 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
1,515 kg
3,340 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
244 km/h
152 mph
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i5.9 s
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
733 km
456 mi
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
660 km
410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
231 hp
172 kW
5.9 s
244 km/h
152 mph
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
225 hp
168 kW
6.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,091 mm
161.1 in
Height
1,299 mm
51.1 in
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
180 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0i
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ4 (E85)3.0iAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
Power
231 hp
172 kW
225 hp
168 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,091 mm
161.1 in
Height
1,299 mm
51.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
180 L
6.4 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Range score
733 km
456 mi
660 km
410 mi
CO2 score
-
226 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
180 L
6.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z4 (E85) 3.0iAUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0i
30i
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsBMWZ4 (E89)30i
1.8 T
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T
3.0i
30i
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsBMWZ4 (G29 LCI)Facelift 202230i
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.0i
30i
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsBMWZ4 (G29)30i
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
3.0i
3.0 si
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsBMWZ4 Coupe (E86)3.0 si
1.8 T
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
3.0i
3.0i
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsBMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITTS Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.0i
2.7
VS
BMWZ4 (E85)3.0ivsPorscheBoxster (987)2.7
1.8 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 TvsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TFSI
BMW Z4 (E85) 3.0i vs AUDI TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster