BMW Z3 (E36/7)
Car comparison
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0ivsAUDI TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8N) · Facelift 2000
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Best power-to-weight177 hp/t132 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score60/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk180 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score28/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,305kg2,877lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 84.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,306mm51in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,446mm96in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,413mm56in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,494mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 180L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 226g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200-5,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i has 6 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T and BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 6.0 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ3 (E36/7)3.0i | AUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 226 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z3 (E36/7) 3.0i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) Facelift 2000 1.8 T
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























