Porsche Boxster (987)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
3.2i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed268 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight208 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score65/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.7s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 615km382mi Calculated | 632km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 3,189cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,329mm170in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 248g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 has 30 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 5.5 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 615 km 382 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 632 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 615 km 382 mi | 632 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 248 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) S 3.2
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























