Porsche Boxster (986)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
3.2i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 610km379mi Calculated | 632km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 3,189cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,455mm57in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 10 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 5.7 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 610 km 379 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 632 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 5.7 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 610 km 379 mi | 632 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























