Porsche Boxster (986)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
3.2i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Fastest top speed258 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score31/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range577 km358 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 577km358mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 3,189cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,455mm57in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has 10 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6.1 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 has more power, AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 577 km 358 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 577 km 358 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 km (0 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























