AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (G29) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score89/100
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 754km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,616mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 117mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 281L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 6.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 821 km 510 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 754 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.3 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.8 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 754 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI | BMW Z4 (G29) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























