AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3)
S 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions172 g/km
- Best estimated range811 km504 mi
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest924 kg2,037 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t178 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 924kg2,037lb |
| Gross weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 43.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 533km331mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 3,824mm151in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 250L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 has 9 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 924 kg 2,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 5.9 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 811 km 504 mi |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 5.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 924 kg 2,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 533 km 331 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 277 km (172 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 501 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























