Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250dvsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,277 km793 mi
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score94/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,277km793mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d has 4 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 6.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d has more power, AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 1,277 km 793 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250d | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,277 km 793 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 507 km (315 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























