AUDI TT Roadster (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSIvsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score32/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,177mm164in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,355mm53in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8S)1.8 TFSI | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8S) 1.8 TFSI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























