Car comparison

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelvsAUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda RX-8

1.3 Wankel

240 hp1308 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2009
VS

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,330 kg
    2,932 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    180 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    290 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    585 km
    363 mi
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
216Nm159lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,330kg2,932lb
1,520kg3,351lb
Gross weight
1,728kg3,810lb
1,905kg4,200lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
76.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
23.5s
Calculated
27.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
162Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
535km332mi
Calculated
585km363mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,308cc80cu in
3,189cc195cu in
Length
4,435mm175in
4,041mm159in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,764mm69in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,345mm53in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,429mm96in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,528mm60in
Rear track
1,505mm59in
1,505mm59in
Trunk volume
290L
220L
Max trunk volume-
490L
Doors
4
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel8,200 rpm7,500 rpm8,450 rpm
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V-2,800-3,200 rpm3,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.5 s
27.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
240 hp
179 kW
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V has 10 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
1,520 kg
3,351 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
535 km
332 mi
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
585 km
363 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
6.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,435 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,345 mm
53.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
Fuel consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,435 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,345 mm
53.0 in
Range score
535 km
332 mi
585 km
363 mi
Trunk score
290 L
10.2 cu ft
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
164 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 Wankel
1.8 T sport
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T sport
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1.3 Wankel
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2i V6 24V
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
1.3 Wankel
630i
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
330Ci
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.7
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel vs AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster