AUDI TT Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsAUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000
3.2i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score79/100
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
- Best estimated range585 km363 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,905kg4,200lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 27.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 577km358mi Calculated | 585km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 3,189cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,041mm159in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,429mm96in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,528mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | - | 2,800-3,200 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 27.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 577 km 358 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 585 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 577 km 358 mi | 585 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V | AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























