Car comparison

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelvsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda RX-8

1.3 Wankel

240 hp1308 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2009
VS

AUDI TT Coupe (8J)

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    583 km
    362 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,330 kg
    2,932 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    180 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    290 L
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
216Nm159lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,330kg2,932lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight
1,728kg3,810lb
1,810kg3,990lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
23.5s
Calculated
22.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
162Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
535km332mi
Calculated
583km362mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,308cc80cu in
3,189cc195cu in
Length
4,435mm175in
4,178mm164in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,352mm53in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,468mm97in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,505mm59in
1,558mm61in
Trunk volume
290L
290L
Max trunk volume-
700L
Doors
4
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
61L
60L
CO2 emissions-
247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel8,200 rpm7,500 rpm8,450 rpm
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,500-3,000 rpm6,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.5 s
22.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
240 hp
179 kW
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 10 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
177 hp/t
132 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
535 km
332 mi
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
583 km
362 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
5.9 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,435 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
177 hp/t
132 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaRX-81.3 WankelAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
216 Nm
159 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,435 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Range score
535 km
332 mi
583 km
362 mi
CO2 score
-
247 g/km
Trunk score
290 L
10.2 cu ft
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
177 hp/t
132 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda RX-8 1.3 WankelAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km18.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi29.01 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year2,704 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 Wankel
1.8 T sport
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T sport
1.3 Wankel
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
630i
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW6 Series (E63)630i
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
330Ci
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.7
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2i V6 24V
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel vs AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster