Car comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8J)

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2010
VS

Mazda RX-8

1.3 Wankel

231 hp1308 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.9 L/100 km
    18.2 mpg US
    21.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    224 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    638 km
    397 mi
  • Largest trunk
    290 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
250hp186kW
231hp172kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
211Nm156lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,379kg3,040lb
Gross weight
1,830kg4,034lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
73.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
21.6s
Calculated
26.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
545km338mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,189cc195cu in
1,308cc80cu in
Length
4,178mm164in
4,430mm174in
Width
1,842mm73in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,352mm53in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,500mm59in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,505mm59in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
290L
290L
Max trunk volume
700L
-
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
60L
61L
CO2 emissions
224g/km
284g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VMazda RX-8 1.3 WankelPowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,800-3,200 rpm6,550 rpm
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel8,200 rpm5,500 rpm9,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.6 s
26.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
231 hp
172 kW

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 19 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
211 Nm
156 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
1,379 kg
3,040 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V5.7 s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
638 km
397 mi
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
545 km
338 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
5.7 s
250 km/h
155 mph
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
231 hp
172 kW
6.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,430 mm
174.4 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
5.7 s
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
Power
250 hp
186 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
211 Nm
156 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,379 kg
3,040 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,178 mm
164.5 in
Height
1,352 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,430 mm
174.4 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
545 km
338 mi
CO2 score
224 g/km
284 g/km
Trunk score
290 L
10.2 cu ft
290 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km19.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi31.54 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,940 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 109 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 94 km (58 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 60 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel

  • Is 51 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2i V6 24V
1.8 T sport
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T sport
1.3 Wankel
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
2.7
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
3.2 V6
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)2.0 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
3.2 JTS V6
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2i V6 24V
2.5 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)2.5 TFSI
1.3 Wankel
3.2i V6 24V
VS
MazdaRX-81.3 WankelvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V vs Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel - car comparison - FastVsFaster