BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82)
Car comparison
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125ivsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score50/100
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 25.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,748mm69in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,423mm56in | 1,352mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 147mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,250 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 25.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 218 hp 163 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i has 18 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
Although BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i has more power, AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 671 km 417 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.2 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i | AUDITT Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 125i
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























