AUDI TT Coupe (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsAUDI TT Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk292 L
- Best economy score87/100
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 71.8s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,352mm53in | 1,353mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 290L | 292L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | 700L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 39 hp more than AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.7 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 638 km 397 mi |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 5.7 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 2 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























