AUDI TT Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Largest trunk292 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,586kg3,497lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 100.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 34.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 292L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 34.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,586 kg 3,497 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 6.1 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 733 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,586 kg 3,497 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | 733 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Coupe (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 286 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























