AUDI SQ8 e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWhvsOnvo L60 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOnvo L60
85 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful503 hp375 kW
- Highest torque973 Nm718 lb-ft
- Largest trunk569 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Onvo L60 85 kWh
- Lightest1,980 kg4,365 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 503hp375kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 973Nm718lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,650kg5,842lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 32.9s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 4,828mm190in |
| Width | 1,976mm78in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,631mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,683mm66in | 1,677mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 569L | 495L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,637L | 1,505L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW |
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh has 41 hp more than Onvo L60 85 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Onvo L60 85 kWh and AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 4.5 s |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh and Onvo L60 85 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.6 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OnvoL6085 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 503 hp 375 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 973 Nm 718 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,650 kg 5,842 lb | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 569 L 20.1 cu ft | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ8 e-tron 114 kWh
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 533 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 74 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Onvo L60 85 kWh
- Is 670 kg lighter
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























