AUDI SQ2
Car comparison
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
D 300 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,031 km641 mi
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best performance score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,959kg4,319lb |
| Gross weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 27.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 1,031km641mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,210mm166in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,495mm59in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,000L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 27.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 1,959 kg 4,319 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 4.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 and AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 764 km 475 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 1,031 km 641 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ22.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 300 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,959 kg 4,319 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 1,031 km 641 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ2 2.0 TFSI
- Is 449 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 300 3.0 V6
- Has 300 Nm more
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 318 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























