BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) M35ivsAUDI SQ2 · Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI SQ2 · Facelift 2020
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 53.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 17.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,216mm166in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,551mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) M35i: Power / Torque
- AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 17.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) M35i has 6 hp more than AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 5.0 s |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 4.9 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) M35i has more power, AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI and BMW X2 (F39) M35i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) M35i and AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 859 km 534 mi |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) M35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)M35i | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)M35i | AUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) M35i | AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) M35i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI SQ2 Facelift 2020 2.0 TFSI
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























