AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA)
Car comparison
AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSIvsSubaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru WRX STI Hatchback
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range706 km439 mi
- Best economy score84/100
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 68.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.1s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 706km439mi Calculated | 566km352mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,302mm169in | 4,415mm174in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,402mm55in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 302L | 1,130L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 201g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-6,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.1 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 has 35 hp more than AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 5.8 s |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6.0 s |
Although Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 has more power, AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 706 km 439 mi |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 566 km 352 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 706 km 439 mi | 566 km 352 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 201 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 302 L 10.7 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI | Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S3 Sportback (8PA) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 828 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























