AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight217 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions157 g/km
- Best estimated range913 km567 mi
- Largest trunk415 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 217hp/t162kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | 913km567mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,466mm176in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,603mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 415L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5,800-6,200 rpm | 1,850-5,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 913 km 567 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | 913 km 567 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























