AUDI S3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
AUDI S3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSIvsDodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDodge Caliber
SRT4 2.4 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score85/100
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 295hp220kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t152kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 579km360mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,359cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,427mm174in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,785mm70in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,011L | 1,360L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 295 hp 220 kW |
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has 30 hp more than AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6.7 s |
Although Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has more power, AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 203 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 723 km 449 mi |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 579 km 360 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 203 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 579 km 360 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI | Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 243 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























