AUDI RSQ8 (4M) · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ8 (4M) · Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight281 hp/t210 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Most powerful687 hp512 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 687hp512kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,275kg5,016lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Gross weight | 3,015kg6,647lb | 3,195kg7,044lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 34.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 281hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 382Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | - |
| Length | 5,022mm198in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 2,007mm79in | 1,931mm76in |
| Height | 1,710mm67in | 1,672mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,692mm67in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,696mm67in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh has 47 hp more than AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh: 47 hp (35 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 3.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 281 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 2024performance 4.0 TFSI V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 687 hp 512 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 281 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ8 (4M) Facelift 2024 performance 4.0 TFSI V8
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 47 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























