AUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
AUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performancevsAUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI RSQ3
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions203 g/km
- Best estimated range744 km462 mi
- Largest trunk356 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 61.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t165kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km462mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,411mm174in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 356L | 356L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,261L | 1,261L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance: Power / Torque
- AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 5,550-6,800 rpm | 1,625-5,550 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 5,200-6,700 rpm | 1,500-5,200 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 367 hp 274 kW |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance has 57 hp more than AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI and AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 4.4 s |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance and AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 222 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 744 km 462 mi |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.4 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | 222 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI performance | AUDIRSQ32.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 462 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance | AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI performance
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI RSQ3 2.5 TFSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























