AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T)
Car comparison
AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8vsBMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E92)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range593 km368 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score58/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 14.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 261hp/t195kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 593km368mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,163cc254cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,649mm183in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,366mm54in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 829L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 8,250 rpm | 4,000-6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8 has 30 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 593 km 368 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 593 km 368 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8 | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RS5 Coupe (8T) 4.2 FSI V8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























