Car comparison

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plusvsWiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012

5.2 FSI V10 plus

550 hp5204 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2012-2015
VS

Wiesmann GT MF5

4.4 V8

555 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2009-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

  • Most powerful
    555 hp
    414 kW
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,470 kg
    3,241 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    378 hp/t
    282 kW/t
    2.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.9 L/100 km
    18.2 mpg US
    21.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.7 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    299 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    543 km
    337 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusWiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
550hp410kW
555hp414kW
Torque
540Nm398lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,470kg3,241lb
Gross weight
1,870kg4,123lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Top speed
319 km/h
198 mph
311 km/h
193 mph
To 99% top speed
57.5s99% target: 316 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
50.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb
Calculated
378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton
Calculated
463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
503km313mi
Calculated
543km337mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,440mm175in
4,220mm166in
Width
1,929mm76in
1,950mm77in
Height
1,252mm49in
1,180mm46in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,507mm99in
Front track
1,638mm64in
-
Rear track
1,595mm63in
-
Trunk volume
100L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
75L
70L
CO2 emissions
346g/km
299g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plusWiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus8,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,250 rpm
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V85,750-6,250 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusWiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
10.7 s
Top speed
319 km/h
198 mph
311 km/h
193 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
209 km/h
130 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
550 hp
410 kW
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 has 5 hp more than AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus and Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
1,470 kg
3,241 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
319 km/h
198 mph
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
311 km/h
193 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus3.8 s
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V83.9 s

Although Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 has more power, AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus and Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
350 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
503 km
313 mi
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
543 km
337 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
550 hp
410 kW
3.8 s
319 km/h
198 mph
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW
3.9 s
311 km/h
193 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
319 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
319 km/h
198 mph
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
3.8 s
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
350 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusWiesmannGT MF54.4 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
555 hp
414 kW
Torque
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.9 s
Top speed
319 km/h
198 mph
311 km/h
193 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
Fuel consumption
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,440 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Range score
503 km
313 mi
543 km
337 mi
CO2 score
346 g/km
299 g/km
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
350 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plusWiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
Consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.08 LC100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.96 LC100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,911 LC/year3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 47 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 plus
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.2 FSI V10 plus
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
4.4 V8
5.2 V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 550-25.2 V10
5.2 FSI V10 plus
GT 5.2 V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
5.2 FSI V10 plus
GT 5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)GT 5.2 FSI V10
4.4 V8
6.2 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)6.2 V8
5.2 FSI V10 plus
Turbo S 3.8
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
4.4 V8
5.2i V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10
4.4 V8
Super Trofeo Stradale 5.2
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 570-4Super Trofeo Stradale 5.2
5.2 FSI V10 plus
4.5 V8
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8
4.4 V8
4.8 V10
VS
WiesmannGT MF54.4 V8vsLexusLFA4.8 V10
5.2 FSI V10 plus
3.8 V6
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10 plus
3.9 V8
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plusvsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 plus vs Wiesmann GT MF5 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster