AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) · Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10vsFerrari California 4.3 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California
4.3 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight319 hp/t238 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range687 km427 mi
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score72/100
Ferrari California 4.3 V8
- Largest trunk340 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 490hp365kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 505Nm372lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | - |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.6s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 59.7s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.5L/100 km11.5mpg US13.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 319hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 687km427mi Calculated | 595km370mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 4,297cc262cu in |
| Length | 4,440mm175in | 4,562mm180in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,909mm75in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 100L | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 305g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California 4.3 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 7,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW |
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 has 35 hp more than Ferrari California 4.3 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California 4.3 V8 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 3.6 s |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 and Ferrari California 4.3 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 319 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 687 km 427 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 595 km 370 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.6 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.8 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | 319 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 490 hp 365 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 687 km 427 mi | 595 km 370 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 305 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 319 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10 | Ferrari California 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) Facelift 2012 5.2 FSI V10
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari California 4.3 V8
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























