Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 TurbovsAUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Quattro (TYP 85)
Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lightest1,273 kg2,806 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best practicality score55/100
Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Highest torque412 Nm304 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 301hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 412Nm304lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,273kg2,806lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,299cc201cu in | 2,133cc130cu in |
| Length | 4,291mm169in | 4,160mm164in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,272mm89in | 2,224mm88in |
| Front track | 1,432mm56in | 1,487mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,700 rpm |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 6,600 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 301 hp 224 kW |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo has 5 hp more than Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo and AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 412 Nm 304 lb-ft |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 1,273 kg 2,806 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 5.4 s |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo and Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | 301 hp 224 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 4.8 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Coupe (TYPE 930)3.3 Turbo | AUDIQuattro (TYP 85)Sport 2.1 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 301 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 412 Nm 304 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,273 kg 2,806 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Coupe (TYPE 930) 3.3 Turbo
- Has 62 Nm more
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AUDI Quattro (TYP 85) Sport 2.1 20V Turbo
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























